inpo performance objectives and criteria

Objective 1: Benchmark/Investigate competency and training effectiveness performance metrics used in other industries against those in DOE. 2 INPO has identified that weak leadership teams and weak organizations have continued to challenge industry performance and have been identified as key drivers of plant declines. D. Personnel clearly understand their authority, responsibilities, accountabilities, and . Page 20/Section 3.1.2 All terminal objectives for tasks identified INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria RP.1 through RP.4, TR.1 ACAD 02-001 Rev 1: Objectives and Criteria for Accreditation of Training Programs in the Nuclear Power Industry Objective 2, Criteria 2.5 - "Personnel, including supplemental and non- plant personnel, satisfy established training and qualification requirements in support 1. of a Healthy Nuclear Safety Culture", the WANO Performance Objectives and Criteria (PO&C 2013-01), INPO 15-005 "Leadership and Team Effectiveness Attributes", among others. Google Scholar INPO. . performance are eliminated or minimized. . Performance Objective: For each project received during the fiscal year, solicit at least one Continuous Improvement: Managers and workers seek continuous improvement and use The following list summarizes the changes to the sixth revision: Clarified the strategy for achieving excellence in human performance in Chapter 1 Incorporated the new performance objective on human performance (OR.3) into Chapter 1 (INPO 05-003, Performance Objectives and Criteria, May 2005) Consolidated topics related to human . Competing incentives for poor performance are eliminated. Its evaluations determine how well INPO' S per- formance objectives and criteria, which are broader and seek a level of performance above the minimum level required by NRC' S regulations, are being met. Nuclear Quality Management Leadership, Nuclear Industry Evaluation Program Performance Objectives and Criteria, (NQML 07 . Pate. The industry clearly established and accepted a form of self-regulation through peer review by helping to develop INPO performance objectives and criteria inpo 05 003 performance objectives and criteria pdf p 1, foreign material exclusion site coordinator training, publications fhwa office of operations, advancing the cause of fuel reliability ans org, safety culture nuclear safety info, inpo organizational and human performance department, efficiency bulletin 17 05 simplified and enhanced, INPO assigns a score between one and four to each nuclear site following the evaluation, where an "INPO 1" is the most favorable score, and an "INPO 4" is an indicator of a nuclear station with significant operational problems. They help to establish the scope and detail of inspections. As an independent, nonprofit organization for public interest energy and environmental research, we focus on electricity generation, delivery, and use in collaboration with the electricity sector, its stakeholders and . Related terminal objectives are then written Page 17/Section3.1.1 When writing a terminal objective, consider the training setting since it has to be balanced against available resources and facility constraints. Perform duties of a First Line Supervisor as requested in support of upcoming INPO (Institute of Nuclear Power Operators) evaluation during 06/2014. C. Responsibilities and authority of each management, supervisory, and professional position are clearly defined. All evaluations are as performance-oriented as practicable and are based on performance objectives and criteria developed by INPO, with industry review. Engineering Fundamentals Knowledge Worker Process Performance (Product Quality) Challenge Boards, Design Review Boards Technical Risk Assessment Tools . Since that time, INPO's scope has undergone refinement to more clearly reflect the role the Institute has in the industry. . In May 1983, an updated plan, the Institutional . Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating Nuclear Electric Generating Stations - first edition, 1981. Financial and non-financial rewards and disincentives are contingent on performance. Champions: Pat Worthington, Todd LaPointe, and Roger Christenson Accomplishments A teleconference was held with INPO National Academy for Nuclear Training representatives in April 2010. Financial and non-financial rewards and disincentives are contingent on performance. 3. . This 2 day program will help prepare Assessment personnel to plan, perform, and report assessments consistent with current industry expectations, lessons learned, and INPO criteria. . INPO, which was established following the Three Mile Island event, provides periodic evaluations of operating facilities. Benchmark other BWR 6 site for FME best practices. INPO 03-004 (Preliminary) 2003. The Criteria of a Learning Objective. 4. SRO license/certification or professional engineering license desired; Excellent communication skills (both oral and written) Strong leadership and change management capability 4. INPO 87)006 "Report on Configuration Management in the Nuclear Utility Industry" INPO 05)003 May 2005 "Performance Objectives and Criteria" INPO AP)929 Rev 1, June 2005 "Configuration Management Process Description" INPO AP)932 Canceled Nov 2013 New Plant Configuration Management Development and Implementation Process INPO 09)003 INPO Principles for a Strong Nuclear Safety Culture (Nov. 2004) INPO SOER 02-04 (Rev. Training and Qualifications: Personnel are trained and qualified for their jobs. Competing incentives for poor performance are eliminated. Here's what you need to know about the upcoming INPO regulation changes and how they . MA APRIL 1983 MAINTENANCE MA.1 MAINTENANCE ORGANIZAT10N AND ADMINWRA710M MA.2 PLANT MATERIAL CONDMON MA.3 WORK CONTROL SYSTEM MA.4 CONDUCT OF MAINTENANCE MA.5 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 4. The industry and INPO jointly develop numerous performance objectives and criteria (POCs). When the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) was formed in 1979, a plan was developed by the nuclear utility industry that provided early direction for the Institute. organization are set forth in the standards and criteria articulated INPO 05-003 PO&Cs OR 4. This feature makes INPO unique. The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), headquartered in Atlanta, GA, is an organization established in 1979 by the U.S. nuclear power industry in response to recommendations by the Kemeny Commission Report, following the investigation of the Three Mile Island accident. The program is designed to provide in-depth analysis of nuclear operating experience . INPO conducts periodic evaluations to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability in the operation, maintenance, and support of nuclear power plants. Criteria INPO 83-014 XA04N2803 INIS-XA-N-2.30 Performance Objectives and Criteria for Plant Evaluations. Students will engage in a dynamic learning environment using activities, videos, and real-life examples that will encourage demonstration, practice, and behavior changes. Other principles documents Performance Objectives and Criteria SOER 10 02, "Engaged, Thinking . Performance Objectives And Attributes NECE-GUID-001 R01 . The purpose of the work was to develop a computerized data base management system on a microcomputer that would assist a utility's training department in meeting some of the performance objectives of the INPO accreditation program. 85. out of 100. All evaluations are as performance-oriented as practicable and are based on performance objectives and criteria developed by INPO, with industry review. Criteria - Identifies how well the participants have to perform to satisfy the requirements. INPO 05-005 iii SECTION PAGE Foreword i 1) Boric Acid Corrosion / Davis-Besse . INPO, Equipment Reliability Process Description, INPO AP-913, Rev. tions of nuclear power plant performance and operating safety one of its most important functions. Utilities may use methods different from those described in this guideline, but they are expected . Google Scholar NEI, The Standard Nuclear Performance Model-A Process Management Approach-Revision 4, 2003. Managing for Performance - An INPO Perspective - 1985. * INPO 05-003, Performance Objectives and Criteria, (2005). Work Activity: Collaborate with others. Performance Objectives and Criteria, (INPO 05-003, May 2005) Human . Dr. Jacobs performed Outage Management Evaluations at the following nuclear power plants: Performance Objectives and Criteria. 5. INPO Engineering - Configuration Management Activities. OBJECTIVE . INPO Performance Improvement Model RESULTS GAPS ACTIONS Implementing Solutions Task Assignment Action Tracking Management Oversight/ Reinforcement Organizational Accountability Resource Management . This V5 of the Finance & Accountability Score provides a baseline measure of an organization's health including the indicators listed in the report below. The mission of the organization is to set industry-wide performance objectives, criteria and guidelines for nuclear power plant operations. INPO has long held that leadership effectiveness, employee engagement, and a strong nuclear safety culture are necessary to achieving sustained plant performance. broad in scope and each objective lists several criteria to provide the breadth and depth of the objective. The material has been distributed into 6 separate training courses, 4 levels for Individual Contributors and Teams, and 2 levels for Management. All evaluations are as performance-oriented as practicable and are based on performance objectives and criteria developed by INPO, with industry review. A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry INPO 05-03 (May 2005) "Performance Objectives and Criteria" Configuration Management CM.1 Maintaining Margins Consistent with Design Requirements CM.2 Operational Configuration Control CM.3 Design Change Processes CM.4 Reactor Engineering and Fuel Management It is not a comprehensive summary of all the source documents, but is aligned in concept. This may be accomplished in a number of ways, including: . objectives and demonstration criteria and on identification of problems for resolution through station processes. In the two decades since 2000, industry performance has continued to improve, as depicted in Fig. 2. Conditions - Specifies under what conditions the participants should perform. Preferred Qualifications. BM 2.1.7 -Safety system tests are undertaken in accordance with s OLC or design authority/manufacturers recommendations. The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) promotes excellence in the operation of nuclear electric generating plants and provides products and services to help nuclear plants operate safely and reliably. The WANO PO&Cs is a key resource for WANO members in their daily operations, and you can read more about the new INPO has identified that weak leadership teams and weak organizations have continued to challenge industry performance and have been identified as key drivers of plant declines . The values, attitudes, and beliefs of the person's immediate work group about hazards in the workplace support safe practices. Finally, the third part of a Mager three-part, performance-based learning objective is the criterion or criteria. INPO sets industry-wide performance objectives, criteria, . As part of this process, an assessment team, including INPO personnel and experienced professionals from other nuclear sites, spends two weeks observing how the site functions and reviewing data on its operating units. performance objectives and criteria (PO&Cs) by providing more detailed descriptions of, and focus on, . Page 17/Section 3.1.1.1 However, feedback should be provided. - High. This score represents Form 990 data from 2019, the latest year electronically filed and . The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), headquartered in Atlanta, GA, is an organization established in 1979 by the U.S. nuclear power industry in response to recommendations by the Kemeny Commission Report, following the investigation of the Three Mile Island accident. As the leading provider of nuclear oversight/audit/codes training, we have worked to ensure this program includes the objectives of interest. Performance Objectives and Criteria for Operating and Near Term Operating License Plants. establishing performance objectives, criteria and guidelines for the nuclear power industry. in the role of overseeing INPO activities while endowing INPO with ample authority to bring pressure for change on individual members and the industry as a whole. Incumbent must be familiar with Institute of Nuclear Power Organizations (INPO), Performance Objectives and Criteria. Neither INPO, INPO members, INPO participants, nor any person acting on the behalf of them (a) makes any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this document, or that the The conduct of plant and corporate evaluations is one of INPO's most important functions. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) conducts research, development, and demonstration projects for the benefit of the public in the United States and internationally. All evaluations are as performance-oriented as practicable and are based on performance objectives and criteria developed by INPO, with industry review. This guideline has been developed using international experts experienced in and familiar with identifying and closing important performance gaps. Each U.S. plant is evaluated once every two years against INPO's performance objectives and criteria. 3. Management and Leadership Development "Individuals with The performance objectives and criteria (POC) support the regulatory assessment of controlled activities by guiding the planning and conduct of ARPANSA inspections. Inpo 12 013 nuclear professionals. 3. . INPO PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES AND CRITERIA "Station personnel select and apply appropriate human error- In a practical sense, certain elements important for reliable prevention techniques commensurate with the importance of human performance become evident when the principles are assigned tasks to minimize the frequency and consequences put . INPO and the industry embraced . organization are set forth in the. Or, as Mager puts it: "Having described what you want your students to do, you can increase the communication power of an objective by telling them HOW WELL you want them to be able to do it." Preparedness-related objectives of INPO 12 - 013, Performance Objectives and Criteria Utilities may use methods different from those described in this guideline, but they are expected An exercise is a drill that is evaluated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Exercises typically test a full ERO team . INPO sets industry-wide performance objectives, criteria, and guidelines for nuclear power plant operations that . NOTICE: This information was prepared in connection with work sponsored by the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). That means a number of things will be changing in the nuclear power industry. Keyword-suggest-tool.com DA: 28 PA: 42 MOZ Rank: 82. Enhance worker knowledge and behaviors in the area of FME prevention techniques. INPO reviews and analyzes . 2. . Our mission at the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) is to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability - to promote excellence - in the operation of commercial nuclear power plants. utilities. PLEASE STATE YOUR NAMES, TITLES AND BUSINESS ADDRESSES. Authored entirely or principally by Dr. It is also the function that is closest to the role of a regulator. 1. 2. The criteria are: A. PERFORMANCE OF UNIT 3 AFTER COMMERCIAL OPERATION 10 INTRODUCTION AND ASSIGNMENT. Revise Performance Objectives and Criteria . INPO - Institute of Nuclear Power Operations. INPO previously issued AP-903, Performance Improvement Process Description, in June 1997. INPO reviews and analyzes operating experience and events from both domestic and non-U.S. nuclear plants. conducting regular detailed evaluations of . INPO was formed in 1979 by the U.S nuclear power industry after the investigation into the Three Mile Island accident. That document overviews . The values, attitudes, and beliefs of the person's immediate work group about hazards in the workplace support safe practices. The assessment team's . These guidelines align with performance objectives and criteria described in INPO 05-003, Performance Objectives and Criteria, May 2005. He developed INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria for the INPO Outage Management Department. Every learning objective should contain at least three parts: Performance - Indicates what participants are expected to do as a result of the learning activity. These applications perform tasks such as automatically screening condition reports, scheduling corrective actions, applying INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria (PO&C) codes, analyzing apparent causes, searching maintenance backlogs for duplicate work, and analyzing stocking levels of parts associated with work loaded in the T-week schedule. INPO Event Report (IER) Level 2, 11-1 . The organizational structure is clearly defined. The POC also support the delivery of a consistent, transparent and rigorous regulatory service to each of our licence . A series of drills, such as an identical . INPO sets industry-wide performance objectives, criteria, and guidelines for nuclear power plant operations that . INPO 04-003 Guidelines for Effective Nuclear Supervisor Performance, Sec. Analysis of results is undertaken and intervention is taken on signs of declining performance BM 2.1.8 -Maintenance and operational oversight programs are used After reviewing industry strengths and areas for improvement, interactions with high-performing organizations, and applicable research with industry groups and executives, nine leadership attributes and five team . CRITERIA SUB-CRITERIA . However, my personal experience reveals that anticipating and preventing active errors during work on plant people use great flexibility on the . Performance Objective: By 28 February, deliver three briefings to key stakeholders regarding the new security initiative within the organization, and write a detailed report on the feedback received. B. . preparedness-related objectives of INPO 12-013, Performance Objectives and Criteria. Presentation to CMBG. The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) is undergoing some revisions to their regulations in regards to industry-wide performance objectives, criteria, and guidelines. 2019 is the revision of the WANO Performance Objectives & Criteria (PO&Cs), which have been improved in order to make them easier for members to use as the 'gold standard' for nuclear safety operations. INPO conducts periodic evaluations to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability in the operation, maintenance, and support of nuclear power plants. Champions: Pat Worthington, Todd LaPointe, and Roger Christenson Accomplishments A teleconference was held with INPO National Academy for Nuclear Training representatives in April 2010. MS-988, Box: 8, Folder: 17 (Mixed Materials) INPO Performance Criteria and Objectives, 1981 - 1982 . addresses INPO Performance Objectives and Criteria (PO&Cs) requirements. INPO 12-008 Revision 1 v Environmental Risk: the potential threat of adverse effects on living organisms and the environment caused by effluents, emissions, wastes, resource depletion, and so forth arising from an organization's activities performance are eliminated or minimized. (NOTE: To view video, right click, copy url, paste in Chrome browser) Preferred Qualifications. Q. Its international counterpart WANO performs such evaluations worldwide at operating nuclear plants. Our mission . Hanford Human Improvement Performance . The score earned by Institute of Nuclear Power Operations is a passing score. INPO reviews and analyzes . The performance objective on human performance 1. INPO conducts periodic evaluations to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability in the operation, maintenance, and support of nuclear power plants. INPO reviews and analyzes . Improved industry performance in the past 20 years is well known, one example data set is representative of many measures of safety and reliability. Staffing and resources are sufficient to accomplish assigned tasks. In his November 13, 2019, testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Adm. Robert Willard, president and chief executive officer of INPO, stated, "By many measures, the U.S. nuclear industry is in its seventh consecutive year of improving per formance. Google Scholar INPO 05 002 PDF - INPO - The Institute of Nuclear Power Operations promotes excellence in the operation of nuclear electric generating plants. After reviewing industry As the industry's premier safety organization, INPO sets performance objectives, criteria, and industry wide guidelines for overall . delivering on performance objectives and shifting priorities in order to support and sustain a strong safety culture. Google Scholar EPRI, Critical Component Identification Process-Licensee Examples, TR-1007935, 2003. . performance on display, owen thomsen p e consultant strategic nuclear, inpo institute of nuclear power operations, inpo 05 003 performance objectives and criteria pdf p 1, nuclear facility configuration management survival guide 2009, traits of a healthy safety culture nuclear safety info, cara mempercepat koneksi internet smartfren gan 100, an WANO PO&C 2013-1, Performance Objectives and Criteria, identifies independent oversight and corporate independent oversight as a cross-functional requirement for organisational effectiveness [1, 2]. The goals of the accreditation program are presented as a set of performance objectives and criteria. Utilizes industry, fleet and site information to achieve results quickly Rolls-Royce Critical Spares has access to a wide range of industry, fleet and site information to quickly identify potential critical spare parts associated with critical components and systems. Human Performance: Human performance behaviors, including procedural adherence and open communications, are used and positively reinforced to support safe and reliable operations. This is done by sharing operational experience between power plants and conducting . SRO license/certification or professional engineering license desired; Excellent communication skills (both oral and written) Strong leadership and change management capability The objective of any operating organization is to take all reasonably practicable measures to prevent accidents in nuclear installations and to mitigate their consequences should they occur; to ensure with a high level of confidence that, for all 1, 2001. Objective 1: Benchmark/Investigate competency and training effectiveness performance metrics used in other industries against those in DOE. to promote the highest levels of safety and reliability - to promote excellence - in the operation of commercial nuclear power plants. Incumbent must be familiar with Institute of Nuclear Power Organizations (INPO), Performance Objectives and Criteria. Focus areas: Prepare station personnel for upcoming INPO evaluation. This paper set forth five areas of management shortfalls in the U.S. nuclear industry that were impeding progress in improved performance. All levels aligned around a common vision and objectives -Understandable at all levels (simple concepts that guide decision-making) -Frequently communicated -Follow-up to ensure understanding Competence developed -Develop and monitor performance at all levels -Leadership team actively engaged in developing leadership and While the two roles, evaluation and regulation, may appear similar, they do differ in some ways.

inpo performance objectives and criteria